Sunday, January 08, 2006

Lopez's suggestion

Is recently that I compile the evidence against Kennedy or Kate.

I have done so - re Scientolgy and Kennedy here - and Kate on SDA 2.0 - ( guess Lopez has not bothered to examine the archives of either place)

As for the issue of Billy Beck and whether he wants his material OFF of No Treason.

It's a simple matter Lopez.

Have you bothered to ASK Billy?

Or are you just taking John T Kennedy's word for it?

I know what the answer to that is...

but it would be funny to the on-lookers of this little spat to hear you say the words out-loud.

*Update* Ernest Brown suggests the following instead which cuts to the bone, on why it is that Billy himself has *nothing to say* on the subject himself.

" bg class="oa">Billy Beck
Dec 27 2005, 4:52 pm show options
Newsgroups: alt.current-events.clinton.whitewater, alt.politics.bush, alt.society.liberalism, talk.politics.misc
From: Billy Beck ...@htva.net> - Find messages by this author
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:52:11 GMT
Local: Tues, Dec 27 2005 4:52 pm
Subject: Re: Bookmark - Beck: Black Church Burnings (was Re: Joy)
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | View Thread | Show original | Report Abuse

" Kurt Lochner" ...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote:

>Billy Beck wrote:
>>Kennedy documented the whole episode here --

>Fuck him..

That's exactly what I've had to say about him [KENNEDY] for months, now.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home